Inequality and Indignity

In the aftermath of the CBO report, the initial botched reporting and political interpretation, and the subsequent backlash, conservatives have had two choices. They can stay with the lies about job destruction — and many have; or they can talk about the work disincentives and claim that they are a terrible thing.

As Brian Beutler says, however, the latter approach teeters very close to 47 percent territory. And the various attempts to make it sound as if the right really has the interests of lower-income Americans at heart — Rand Paul declaring that extended unemployment benefits trap workers in long-term unemployment, Paul Ryan talking about the dignity of work — just sink them deeper into the quicksand.

Let’s talk, in particular, about dignity.

It’s all very well to talk vaguely about the dignity of work; but the idea that all workers can regard themselves as equal in dignity despite huge disparities in income is just foolish. When you’re in a world where 40 money managers make as much as 300,000 high school teachers, it’s just silly to imagine that there will be any sense, on either side, of equal dignity in work. And one demonstration of this reality is the angry reaction people like me get when we cite facts like this; nobody, and I mean nobody, on the right that I’ve encountered seems willing simply to accept the fact and argue that it’s justified. Instead, they regard pointing out the reality of extreme inequality as somehow inherently outrageous — because they know how explosive that reality is.

As it turns out, by the way, the people who seem least inclined to value work in itself, even if it doesn’t pay very well, are the winners: we live in the age of the angry billionaire, furious if anyone should suggest that his wealth doesn’t entitle him to acclamation as well as luxury.

Now, one way to enhance the dignity of ordinary workers is through, yes, entitlements: make it part of their birthright, as American citizens, that they get certain basics such as a minimal income in retirement, support in times of unemployment, and essential health care.

But the Republican position is that none of these things should be provided, and that if somehow they do get provided, they should come only at the price of massive government intrusion into the recipient’s personal lives — making sure that you don’t take advantage of health reform to work less, requiring that you undergo drug tests to receive unemployment benefits or food stamps, and so on.

In short, while conservatives may preach the dignity of work, their actual agenda is to deny lower-income workers as much dignity — and personal freedom — as possible.

via:http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/02/11/inequality-and-indignity/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0